온라인강의

Reporting Completeness based on PRISMA-Abstract checklist in Acupuncture Meta-analysis Abstracts
강사명Inhu Bae 강의시간5분 강의개설일2025-12-10
온라인강의

강의소개

Objectives: As it has been reported that many researchers only read abstracts, abstracts should report all necessary information, to avoid misinforming readers. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 for Abstract (PRISMA-Abstract) was developed to enhance the reporting completeness of abstracts. However, research on the actual level of reporting completeness in acupuncture meta-analysis (MA) abstracts remains limited. This study aims to assess the reporting completeness of acupuncture MAs using PRISMA-Abstract and identify associated factors.



Conclusion: The reporting completeness of the abstracts of the acupuncture MAs shows room for improvement, particularly in limitations, interpretation and important implications, which are important for interpreting and applying the results in clinical settings. However, contrary to previous studies, articles by China-affiliated authors and CAM journals had higher reporting completeness. PRISMA compliance declarations or checklist submissions were not significant influencing factors suggesting that authors’ actual understanding may be limited. Adequate training and specific journal policies are needed to enhance acupuncture MA abstract reporting

강사소개

A PhD candidate at the Acupuncture and Meridian Science Research Center, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University. She earned a K.M.D. and an M.S. in Korean Internal Medicine from Kyung Hee University and is a board-certified specialist in internal Korean medicine. Her current research interests include methodological evaluation in acupuncture research, transparent reporting, and reporting completeness.